We preventunintended data losswhen employees use AI.
Practical AI Security from mid-market to global leaders: we mask sensitive data in real time before it reaches public AI clouds. Every prompt is checked. GDPR and EU AI Act compliant.
The intelligent control layer between your people and AI.
BRANE checks every request before sensitive information leaves your controlled environment. Depending on your requirements, BRANE is deployed locally, in your own infrastructure or in a suitable cloud environment, and governs which AI model may process which data.
Sensitive data stays inside your network.
Detection, masking and logging run in your own environment: local, hybrid or fully offline. Your infrastructure decides which model can be reached.
EU AI ACT
Evidence, not assertions.
BRANE keeps a tamper-evident record of who sent which data to which model, and when. That is the ground you stand on when GDPR and the EU AI Act have to be evidenced.
Partnerships and origin
Engineered in Germany, headquartered in Stuttgart.
Connect PartnerSoftware & ServicesMade in Germany
Trusted by
From mid-market to global leaders.
One control layer betweenyour people and every AI.
- Data protection
No plaintext leaves the network
Personal data, contracts and trade secrets are detected and masked before the request goes out.
- Audit logging
Every interaction accountable
Who, when, which model, which data class? Logged for audit, still readable months later.
- Compliance
EU AI Act and GDPR on the record
Policies per role and data class, with the evidence that they took effect.
Six functions between your people and cloud AI.
Detect, understand, mask, route, release, block. Every prompt runs through the same control layer before it leaves the network. In under 200 milliseconds.
Detect what nobody else sees.
Real-time classification of every data class in under 200 ms. PII, IP, contracts, code, trade secrets.
Your secure AI assistant.
How can I help?
Example prompt
My name is Laura Schmidt, I live in Munich and my phone number is 0171-3920042. Please summarise my contract VTR-2024-8891.
Go one level deeper.
Keynote
Watch our vision for secure AI
Your AI quick check
Three answers is all it takes. See how many prompts leave your network each year, and what that means with the provider you use today.
News & Perspectives
Agentic Security·The Hacker News“Phishing 3.0”: Security Researchers Say the Next Wave of Attacks Is Agent Versus Agent
New analysis describes a shift from static phishing emails to AI agents that generate personalized, conversational, multi-channel lures faster than a person — or a traditional filter — can keep up with. A 2026 Dark Reading readership poll found 48% of security professionals now rank agentic AI as the top attack vector of the year, ahead of deepfakes, while independent testing found Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace's built-in email defenses are missing hundreds of phishing messages per 100 mailboxes every month.
Source: The Hacker NewsRead article
Supply chain·heise.deLiteLLM attack: over 2500 companies affected
Manipulated packages in the Python index gave attackers access to roughly 434,000 automated build pipelines across more than 2,500 companies, among them Airbus, Samsung, Salesforce and Volkswagen. Cloud keys, repository tokens, SSH keys, Kubernetes secrets and AI provider keys were taken. The malicious packages were online for only 40 minutes.
Source: heise.deRead article
Data Breach Costs·helpnetsecurity.comData breach cost 2026 averaged $4.99 million, AI attacks ran higher
The 2026 IBM Cost of a Data Breach Report, released this morning and based on Ponemon Institute interviews at more than 600 breached organizations, puts the average breach at $4.99 million — a record, and up more than a tenth year over year. Employees using unapproved AI tools figured in 43% of security incidents, more than double the prior year's share; about half of those incidents ended in data loss or compromise and roughly one in five drew a regulatory fine. Among organizations that suffered an incident involving an AI model or application, 92% lacked role-based access, multifactor authentication or comparable controls on those systems, and close to seven in ten breached organizations h
Source: helpnetsecurity.comRead article
Discover AI-Z
